top of page

Repatriation: Returning human remains and cultural heritage to Indigenous communities

Writer: Aiyana Lacota Aiyana Lacota

Repatriation: Returning human remains and cultural heritage to Indigenous communities
Repatriation: Returning human remains and cultural heritage to Indigenous communities | Photo: Boston Public Library

In recent decades, repatriation has emerged as a vital process in archaeology, involving the return of ancestral human remains and significant cultural artefacts to Indigenous communities. This practice, central to cultural preservation and human rights, aligns with broader global goals such as sustainable development, social justice, and environmental protection. Repatriation is not just about fulfilling legal obligations but also about healing historical wounds and addressing the injustices of cultural appropriation. The laws, such as the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) in the United States, have shaped how archaeologists approach this delicate subject. Yet, the journey toward returning these remains is far from complete, with over 110,000 ancestors still in collections across the world.


The importance of repatriation: A matter of human rights and justice


The concept of repatriation gained significant legal ground with the passing of key laws, including the National Museum of the American Indian Act in 1989 and NAGPRA in 1990. These laws were met with resistance within the archaeological community, with concerns over limited research opportunities. However, this resistance has softened over time, as archaeologists have realised that repatriation has profound ethical and cultural implications.


Take, for instance, the case of the Kennewick Man, also known as the "Ancient One." Discovered in Washington state in 1996, these remains date back over 8,000 years. Initially, scientists fought for the right to study the remains, but in 2016, the law mandated their return to Indigenous tribes, in line with the wishes of the local Native American communities. This case highlighted the tension between scientific exploration and respect for Indigenous culture, ultimately pushing for a more respectful approach to the treatment of human remains.



The Kennewick Man

The process of repatriation also provides a platform for addressing historical trauma suffered by Indigenous communities. Returning remains is seen as an essential step towards reconciliation, helping communities heal from past wrongs and reconnect with their ancestral heritage.


The repatriation process: Balancing law and ethics


Repatriation is not just a legal procedure; it is a careful process that requires compliance with both legal and ethical standards. Under NAGPRA, remains and artefacts that are considered sacred or funerary must be returned to the appropriate communities. This involves extensive documentation, including information about the remains, their provenance, and how they ended up in museum collections. The law mandates that this information is shared with communities that may have a cultural or ancestral connection to the objects.


Cultural affiliation is a critical step in the repatriation process. This thorough analysis assesses whether there is a demonstrable link between the remains or artefacts and a living Indigenous group. It involves reviewing physical characteristics, oral histories, and cultural evidence. While the law applies to federally recognised Indigenous communities, many museums and institutions choose to extend this process to non-recognised groups, promoting inclusivity and respect for all Indigenous cultures.


Once a cultural affiliation is confirmed, the physical return of the remains is planned in collaboration with the requesting communities. This may include performing ceremonial rites, such as offering tobacco to honour the spirits of the ancestors.


Challenges and the road ahead


Unfortunately, the repatriation process is not without its challenges. Many of the remains that are subject to repatriation have been stored for decades, sometimes suffering from the degradation of time and improper storage. As such, the efforts to return these remains are often delayed, and some items may already be too damaged to be studied fully.


Moreover, there are still significant gaps in the repatriation efforts. While some laws have been passed, over 110,000 ancestors remain in institutions awaiting repatriation. This highlights the ongoing need for more comprehensive, global efforts to ensure that cultural heritage is respected and protected. There is a strong link between repatriation and the global goals, particularly SDG 16 - Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions, which calls for the protection and promotion of human rights and justice.

 

The global society plays a crucial role in supporting repatriation. This is not just a matter for national governments or Indigenous communities; it requires cooperation across borders. International agreements and frameworks, such as the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), call for the recognition of Indigenous peoples' rights, including the right to reclaim their ancestral remains and cultural objects.


As the global community continues to work towards the SDGs, repatriation has become an essential part of achieving a more just and equitable future. Returning ancestral remains is more than an act of compliance with laws; it is about acknowledging the rights and dignity of Indigenous peoples and ensuring their cultural heritage is honoured. This act of respect is crucial in creating a world where economic equality, social justice, and environmental protection are the pillars of society.


A step towards healing and sustainability


In conclusion, repatriation is a powerful tool for healing historical wounds and fostering global collaboration. It represents a shift in how archaeology, cultural heritage, and human rights intersect, ensuring that Indigenous communities can reconnect with their ancestors and preserve their cultural identity. By aligning repatriation efforts with the global goals, the world can move towards a future that honours diversity, promotes peace and justice, and supports sustainability in all aspects of society.


Repatriation is not just about the past; it’s about creating a future where respect, justice, and human dignity are upheld. For further insights into global initiatives promoting cultural justice and sustainability, explore more about the ongoing efforts of organisations dedicated to this vital cause.

 

 

 



bottom of page